Article Topics


Search
Search by Keyword:


Resources Downloads

| Using Changes in Talent Mix to Calculate Hiring ROI |
| Newsletters |
| Written by Lou Adler |
| Wednesday, 02 September 2009 00:00 |
|
The Basics of Hiring ROI It doesn’t take much for the total compensation for new hires to become a huge number. As a result, it’s important to get some visibility on how wisely this money is being spent. In most cases, once a req is approved, making the decision on whom to hire is problematic. There are very few controls in place to make sure that this money is being spent to maximize overall company performance. Calculating the hiring ROI allows HR and recruitment management to get a handle on this important figure and influence line management on how to expend these massive funds in some reasonable manner. In addition, calculating hiring ROI can quickly determine how well you're now doing on hiring for quality, as well as figure out the ROI of any new hiring or sourcing program being evaluated.
With a richer mix of higher level talent the ROI would obviously increase, but getting to an average B level talent mix, requires a lot more As, half as many Cs replaced by Bs, and very few mistakes. Pulling this off would increase the total contribution to 2X compensation for a hiring ROI of 100%. This means the company earns a net dollar for every dollar in compensation. Calculating the Incremental Hiring ROI of Any New Recruiting Program Determining a company's current talent mix level is the first step in determining the ROI of any new program designed to improve this mix. The net gain due to this improvement can then be compared to the cost of the program to calculate ROI. This is the part of the analysis your CFO will enjoy criticizing. The increased contribution by improving the talent mix is referred to as incremental hiring ROI. Incremental hiring ROI is calculated by comparing the change in net impact to the cost of making the change. For example purposes, let's use the same B- level talent mix described earlier and figure out how to get 10% better. Essentially, this requires replacing a fair bunch of the Cs, Ds, and any Fs (10% of the total group size, in fact) with Bs, B+s, and one or two more As. From an internal process standpoint, it means you would have to stop doing some things and start doing a lot of other things. Using our talent mix model this results in a talent mix midway between the B- level and a full B level, and a contribution multiplier of 1.75 times compensation. Now for the CFO high-five part. To calculate the incremental hiring ROI of getting this 10% improvement, all you need to do is figure out what it costs to hire these 10 stronger people and compare this to the impact the total group now makes. It's important to note that incremental hiring ROI is fundamentally different than total hiring ROI. Total hiring ROI is calculated by comparing total net impact to total compensation. Incremental hiring ROI is calculated by determining the increase in total net impact to the investment required to obtain this increase. In the original example, a 10% increase requires 10 better hires and 10 fewer bad hires. This shift increases the net contribution of 100 people from $3.25mm to $4.8mm, for a $1.6mm net increase. If it costs $100 thousand to obtain this, the ROI would be 1500%, which would get most CFOs to smile, if it were validated. Using this approach, to calculate the ROI of any new hiring program you first need to determine your current talent mix baseline and then use the improvement in this talent mix to justify any proposed expenditure. In the example, if you prove you can obtain this 10% improvement, it's obviously a remarkable ROI, one that both your CFO and CEO will notice. However, now for the bad part. While this approach for calculating the ROI of any new hiring initiative is valid, as the economy recovers, getting the forecasted improvements will be more difficult. Once the demand for talent increases, you'll need to implement a bunch of new programs and add staff just to maintain the status quo. Regardless, you can use the same ROI concept, but use preventing the loss of some of your existing talent worsening your current talent mix profile as the justification for the expenditure. Alternatively, to minimize the loss of talent due to increased demand you could train your recruiters and manager to use Performance-based Hiring. This could be either as a standalone process or in parallel with any of your new hiring initiatives. Performance-based Hiring will ensure you achieve the full projected ROIs despite the economic recovery. While this might seem a bit self-serving, without a systematic approach to hiring like Performance-based Hiring that considers sourcing, interviewing, recruiting, and retention collectively, you'll most likely fail to hire many of the best people you find, or lose some of the best you already have out the back door. More importantly, you can do this at such a low cost the ROI is staggering. ( This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it if you'd like to see how Performance-based Hiring can improve your current talent mix, and make sure you invite your CFO along for the evaluation.) |